Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43633 (PAT)

Dinesh sahani @ Dinesh kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./87382/2025 · 2026-01-12

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87382 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2025 Thana- Gadhiya Bazar District- East Champaran ====================================================== Dinesh sahani @ Dinesh kumar Son of Shivpujan Sahani Resident of village- kodhiya, ps- Garahiya Bazar, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per the F.I.R., the petitioner along with other named accused persons came at the place of occurrence and started abusing the informant. When objection raised by the informant then all the accused persons assaulted him and his family members. Allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the informant’s wife with sharp cut weapon causing cut injury. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that petitioner and informant are neighbours and due to land dispute, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87382 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 occurrence took place between them in which both the parties got injury. The injury allegedly caused by this petitioner is simple in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Garahiya Bazar (Gadhiya Bazar) P.S. Case No. 113 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. utkarsh/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T