Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43632 (KAR)

SRI NARAYANASWAMY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/17417/2021 · 2026-09-23

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010304372021 NC: 2026:KHC:53469 WP No. 17417 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 17417 OF 2021 (SC/ ST) BETWEEN: SRI. NARAYANASWAMY, S/O. LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT KATTIGENAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, PIN-560081. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P.M., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU-560002. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU-560003. 4. SRI. BALARAM U. NICHANI, S/O. UDHAWADAS H. NICHANI, RESIDING AT NO.46, SAI KRUPA, C FAIR FIELD LAYOUT, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010304372021 NC: 2026:KHC:53469 WP No. 17417 of 2021 RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. 5. SRI. P.SHYAMARAJU, S/O. LATE P.NARASARAJU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.343, 4TH MAIN ROAD, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU-560080. 6. SRI. S.BHOJARAJ, W/O. RAMACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.335, 4TH MAIN ROAD, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU-560080. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. V.KRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R5 AND R6 R4 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010304372021 NC: 2026:KHC:53469 WP No. 17417 of 2021 The petition was listed on 10.08.2026. At request on behalf of the petitioner, it was ordered to be listed today i.e., 23.09.2026. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62