Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43632 (CAL)

SNEH COMPRINT PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/20595/2023 · 2026-09-24

Smita Das De

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01 24.09.2026 Court No. 10 AGM In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side W.P.A. 20595 of 2023 Sneh Comprint Private Limited -versus State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Sanjana Jha. …For the Petitioner. Ms. Manasi Mukherjee. Mr. Bijitesh Mukherjee. … For the State. 1. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that his client does not intend to proceed with the writ petition any further. 2. In view of such submission, the writ petition along with application stand dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. 3. The petitioner submits that since the Appellate Tribunal has already been constituted and is functional, the instant writ petition be transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and seeks eight weeks time to prefer an appeal before the GSTAT Kolkata under Section 112 of the CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017. The period during which the petition has been pending be excluded for computing limitation. 4. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. 5. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. ( Smita Das De, J.)