- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010301912026 NC: 2026:KHC:52470 WP No. 14278 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 14278 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. V P M ABOOTY S/O LATE MOHAMMED, AGED 74 YEARS, R/O SHAKEER MANZIL, PANCHAPOIKA POST, KANNUR DISTRICT, KERALA - 670 643. ALSO RESIDING AT VALNOOR -THYAGATHOOR VILLAGE, KUSHALNAGAR TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M M ASHOKA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPT BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S BUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KODAGU DISTRICT AT MADIKERI-571 201. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KODAGU AT MADIKERI - 571 201. Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010301912026 NC: 2026:KHC:52470 WP No. 14278 of 2026 4. THASILDAR, KUSHALNAGAR TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT - 571 236. 5. REVENUE INSPECTOR, KUSHALNAGAR HOBLI, KUSHALNAGAR TALUK, KODAGU 571 236. 6. VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, VALNOOR-THYAGATHUR VILLAGE, KUSHALNAGAR TALUK, KODAGU -571 236. 7. SRI. T.T. SAJJAD, S/O V.P.M.ABOOTTY, AGED 34 YEARS, R/AT CHARISHMA, MOORIYAD ROAD, KOOTHHUPARAMBU, KANNUR, KERALA-670 643. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R6; SRI. B.S. SACHIN.,ADVOCATE FOR R7) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 10/04/2026 PASSED IN RP NO.07/2025 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO-2 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ALSO ORDER DATED 20/11/2025 PASSED IN R.A.NO.68/2025 BY THE AS PER ANNEXURE-B BY DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO-3 RESPONDENT NO-4,5 AND 6 TO RESTORE THE MUTATION AND RTC AS IT WAS EXISTING EARLIER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010301912026 NC: 2026:KHC:52470 WP No. 14278 of 2026 ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 10.04.2026 (Annexure-A) and Order dated 20.11.2025 (Annexure-B) passed by the respondent- authorities. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that respondent No.7 is the son of the petitioner. The dispute is between the family members of the petitioner. 4. The perusal of impugned orders would indicate that the petitioner had acquired 'A' and 'B' schedule properties as mentioned in the writ petition, and the schedule 'A' property has been relinquished by the petitioner herein in favour of the respondent No.7 as per the release deed dated 08.06.2017 and thereafter the respondent No.7 has sold the same as per the registered sale deed dated 22/24.07.2025. 5. It is also forthcoming from the impugned orders that the three suits are pending consideration in respect of the subject land in OS No.9/2025 before the Civil Judge (Senior - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010301912026 NC: 2026:KHC:52470 WP No. 14278 of 2026 Division) at Somwarpet, OS No.3/2025 and OS No.47/2025 before the Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) at Kushalnagara. 6. In that view of the matter, as the petitioner is claiming that the petitioner had purchased the property and also it is to be noted that respondent No.7 is the son of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, the impugned orders at Annexures-A and B is accordingly modified by directing respondent No.4-Tahsildar to enter the name of the petitioner, respondent No.7 and the other children of the petitioner herein in respect of the subject land in question, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The entry in the revenue records is subject to the result of the suits pending before the Competent Civil Courts referred to above. With this observation, writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE RU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6