1 2026:CGHC:8153 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1375 of 2026 1 - Ku. Shakuntala Rathore D/o Late Harishankar Rathore Aged About 58 Years Presently Working As Lecturer Commerce Government Higher Secondary School Dashrangpur, Block And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Krishna Devi Sahu W/o Shri Hemant Kumar Sahu Aged About 39 Years Presently Working As Lecturer Commerce Government Higher Secondary Kona, Block And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Commissioner Division Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Joint Director Education Division, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh 6 - Collector District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 7 - District Education Officer District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh 8 - District Education Officer District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ... Respondents 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar Soni, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Akanksha Verma Dabhadker, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 13 /02/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court Pleased to Hold that Action on the Part of the Respondent Authorities is in Patent Violation of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution Of India and same is Illegal, Arbitrary, Capricious and Bad in Law & is liable to be set aside. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may Kindly be pleased to Quash Impugned Order Dated 25.09.2025 ANNEXURE-P/7_and Impugned Order Dated 25.09.2025 ANNEXURE-P/8 respectively and Respondent May Kindly be Directed to Proceed in Accordance with the Letter and Spirit of the Directives Dated 02.08.2024 of the Rationalization Scheme & Also Directed Respondent No.02 to Decide the Pending Representation of both the Petitioners Preferred on 22.07.2025 (Annexure-P/3). 10.3 That this Hon'ble Court may Kindly be pleased to call the entire record of the case. 10.4 Any Other Relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the Petitioner together with cost of the Petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the Respondents/State submits that according to her instructions, appeal filed by the petitioner before the State Level Committee headed by the Director, Public Instructions is rejected. She placed the copy of the order 17.12.2025 before this Court and also handed it over to the counsel for the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till today, petitioner was not made aware about the decision of the State Level Committee, however, the copy of the order dated 17.12.2025 is supplied in the Court by the counsel for the Respondents/State. He submits that in view of the submissions made by the counsel for Respondents/State, he may be 3 permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file fresh, challenging order of State Level Committee also. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.02.17 12:11:12 +0530