Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91168 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-457 Year-2022 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== Ranjeet Mahto S/o Harendra Mahto Resident of Village- Rajdhani, P.S.- Taraiya, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.J harkhandi Upadhyay, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 19-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other persons being armed with lathi, iron rod and daab arrived. It is alleged that all the four persons including the petitioner started assaulting the informant on his head due to which he sustained head injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the nature of allegation is general and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91168 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 omnibus and from perusal of the injury report annexed with this petition as Annexure P/2, it is clear that the informant has received only one injury caused by hard and blunt substance..
Learned counsel for the petitioner has furtrher submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case which has been filed by through supplementary affidavit. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 15.09.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 457 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Saran at Chapra.
Shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T