V VENKATESWARLU, GUNTUR v. PRL SECY., TO GOVT., REV [VIG-IV.3] DEPT., HYD & 3 OTHERS
WP/17715/2012 · 2026-06-28
B Krishna Mohan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4361 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4361 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026 Date of uploading : 08.07.2026 APHC010440032012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 17715/2012 Between:
1. V VENKATESWARLU, GUNTUR, S/O. KOTAIAH, OCC: EX- EXECUTIVE OFFICER, R/O. DOOR NO.3-29-55, KRISHNA NAGAR, GUNTUR.
...PETITIONER AND
1. PRL SECY TO GOVT REV VIGIV 3 DEPT HYD 3 OTHERS, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (VIGILANCE.IV.3) DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD.
2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, BOGGULAKUNTA, HYDERABAD.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR.
4. THE MANAGER, SRI AGASTESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, KOMMURU, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any Writ, order or directions more in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, call for the records and quash the proceedings of the 1st respondent vide Memo No.27689/Vig-IV-3/2008-3, dt.11.04.2012 by declaring
2 BKM,J W.P.No.17715 of 2012
the same as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein not to take any coercive steps against petitioner pursuant to the 1st Respondent proceedings IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 22680 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.15/2010 in 0.8.1\10.2/94 pending on the file of Senior Civil Judge Court, Addanki, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA SC For Endowments
2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
3 BKM,J W.P.No.17715 of 2012
The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause survives in this writ petition.
2. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
29.06.2026 PGT
Whether the order is : Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable Non-reportable ☑