Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 436 (RAJ)

VIJAY SINGH @ VIJAYDEV S/O BACCHU SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2706/2026 · 2026-02-27

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9309] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 2706/2026 Vijay Singh @ Vijaydev S/o Bacchu Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Kathera Chauth, Police Station Sadar Deeg, District Deeg. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sjb Jail Behror, District Behror- Kotputli) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kaswa For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 27/02/2026 1. This second bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 784/2021 registered at Police Station Behror, District Bhiwadi for offences punishable u/S 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC and Section 4 and 6 of the Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfairmeans) Act, 1992. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 3. The allegation against the accused petitioner is that he is the mediator between original candidate and the dummy candidate and it is urged that he made arrangement of a dummy candidate in lieu of some money. The accused petitioner is said to be in [2026:RJ-JP:9309] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2706/2026] custody since 12.12.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed in the matter and there is no criminal antecedent against the accused petitioner, therefore he may be released on bail. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that police has already submitted charge-sheet in the matter and co-accused namely Rishipal Singh and Saurabh Singh have already been enlarged on bail and so as to maintain the parity, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /4