Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43590 (KAR)

PS AYUB @ BOMMANAHALLI BABU v. STATE BY JAYANAGAR PS

WP/17271/2023 · 2026-09-24

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010403812023 NC: 2026:KHC:53061 WP No. 17271 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION No.17271 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: PS AYUB @ BOMMANAHALLI BABU S/O SYED BASHA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT T-3, MARIAMMA APARTMENTS, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005 …PETITIONER (BY SRI MOHAMMED TAHIR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY JAYANAGAR PS REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OFFICE AT HIGH COURT COMPLEX, OPP. TO VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001 2. SUMATHI GOVT OFFICIAL GAZETTED AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, ARO 132, TUMAKURU TOWN, ASSEMBLY, TUMAKURU TUMAKURU-572102 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SURYA MUKUNDARAJ, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 17.3.2023 BEARING CRIME NO.49/2023 AT ANNEXURE- A REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 JAYANAGARA PS Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010403812023 NC: 2026:KHC:53061 WP No. 17271 of 2023 U/S 171E OF IPC, SAME IS PENDING BEFORE THE HON’BLE IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT TUMAKURU WHEREIN PETITIONERS ARE ARRAYED AS SOLE ACCUSED THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Mohammed Tahir, that ‘B’ final report came to be filed. 2. Sri Surya Mukundaraj, learned Additional Public Prosecutor however would seek time to verify the same. 3. Placing the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that ‘B’ report is filed, present petition stands dismissed as it has rendered infructuous. 4. However, if the information to the learned counsel for the petitioner that ‘B’ report has been filed is found to be incorrect, present petition can be revived. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 64 CT:VRR