[2026:RJ-JP:12653] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2696/2026 Prince @ Bhayyu @ Gappi S/o Shri Vipin Arora, R/o Nikhil Juice Centre Ke Pass, Mokapada, Police Station Kaithoonipol, Kota City, District Kota (Raj.) (At Presently Confined In District Jail Kota). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma with Mr. Lokesh Gopaliya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Dhakar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/03/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 220/2025 registered with the Police Station R.K. Puram, District Kota City, wherein he has been charged for the offences punishable under Section(s) 109(1), 308(2), 189(2), 118(1), 310(2), 312 B.N.S., 2023 and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has not been named in the aforesaid FIR and even though, a test identification parade was also conducted wherein the accused-petitioner has not been identified by the complainant. Counsel submits that all the injuries sustained by the injured, were found to be simple in nature. Counsel submits that the other co-accused Golu was identified by the injured, and even then [2026:RJ-JP:12653] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2696/2026] indulgence of bail has also been granted to him by the Trial Court. After investigation, the charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner under Section(s) 109(1), 308(2), 189(2), 118(1), 310(2), 312 B.N.S., 2023 and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. Counsel submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.11.2025 and the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail may be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that a test identification parade was conducted by police wherein the complainant has not identified the accused-petitioner and all the injuries sustained by the injured were found to be simple in nature. The other co- accused i.e. Golu was identified by the injured and even then indulgence of bail has also been granted to him by the Trial Court and also looking to the fact that the accused-petitioner has been in custody since 17.11.2025 and the trial will take its own time to conclude, hence, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the accused-petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Prince @ Bhayyu @ Gappi S/o Shri Vipin Arora arrested in connection with the aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; [2026:RJ-JP:12653] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2696/2026] provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- along with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all the dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Puneet-Shivam/45