Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010014042026 2026:GAU-AS:5072 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/171/2026 SMTI LILA BEGUM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,WIFE OF LATE MOSTAN ALI, D/ O LATE ROIS ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NARIKHOLI,P.O - LAKSHMIBAZAR P.S AND DISTRICT - SRIBHUMI ASSAM. VERSUS ABDUL KARIM AND ANR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARSS/O LATE ROIS ALI, RESIDENT OF DHARAKUNA, WARD NO.2, KARIMGANJ MUNICIPAL BOARD, P.O AND P.S - KARIMGANJ, DISTRICT - SRIBHUMI, ASSAM, PIN-788712 2:PIYARA BEGUM AGED ABOUT 34 YEARSD/O LATE ROIS ALI WIFE OF ABDUL MUTLIB RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - ALONGJURI P.O - SILCHAR ROAD P.S - KARIMGANJ DISTRICT - SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-788713PERMANENT ADDRESS LONGAI ROAD SARALKHA ROAD P.O- SETTLEMENT ROA For the Applicant(s) : Mr. B.D. Das, Sr. Advocate Mrs. R. Deka, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M.R. Talukdar, Advocate Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 06.04.2026 Heard Mr. B.D. Das, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mrs. R. Deka, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant. Mr. M.R. Talukdar, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the writ petitioners. 2. This is an application filed by the applicant seeking to be arrayed as a respondent in the accompanying writ petition on the ground that it was at the instance of the applicant that the birth certificates issued to the writ petitioners on 15.11.2013 were cancelled by the respondent No. 4 in the accompanying writ petition. 3. It is the opinion of this Court that the applicant is a necessary party for the adjudication of the dispute. Accordingly, this Court impleads the applicant herein as the respondent No. 5 in the accompanying writ petition. 4. The learned counsel for the writ petitioners is directed to file a fresh Memo of Parties before the Registry of this Court within 7 (seven) days and the Registry on the basis of the instant order as well as the fresh Memo of Parties shall make necessary Page No.# 3/3 correction in the cause title and update the same in the CIS. 5. With the above, the Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant