Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43579 (PAT)

Kanhai Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./88584/2025 · 2026-01-06

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88584 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Kanhai Kumar Son of Rakesh Prasad Resident Of Village- Kunj, Ps- Roh, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 06-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 338, 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 111, 317(2), 317(5) & 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and under Sections 66(B), 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the house of this petitioner was raided on the confessional statement of one co-accused Pintu Kumar and from the house of this petitioner 08 mobile phones, passbook, ID, Aadhar, PAN card and ATM cards were recovered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that save and except this recovery there is nothing against the petitioner and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88584 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/2 there is no complaint against him of cheating anybody or committing cyber fraud with any person. Only recovery of mobile phones, passbook, PAN card and ATM’s which are of the petitioner, the case under cyber fraud cannot be made out. It is only the assumption of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and is in judicial custody since 15.08.2025. 5. Learned Additional Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Nawada. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T