IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88173 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-462 Year-2024 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== Ray Kumar @ Rai Kumar S/O Balmiki Yadav R/O Jitan Chhapra, P.S- Rani Talab, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 02-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. Based on mentioning made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the case has been listed under the heading “To Be Mentioned”. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was granted the privilege of regular bail by an order dated 30-1-2026 with a condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father. It is next submitted that father of the petitioner is also an accused in the instant case thus the father could not be made a bailor. It is further submitted that this fact inadvertently escaped his attention. It is next submitted that brother-in-law of the petitioner, namely, Sushil Kumar, had sworn the affidavit, as such Sushil Kumar be made a bailor. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88173 of 2025(3) dt.02-02-2026 2/2 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his brother-in-law, namely, Sushil Kumar, instead of his father, Balmiki Yadav. 5. The order dated 30-1-2026 is modified to the extent indicated above. Rest of the order shall remain the same. Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T