Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4357 (BOM)

SUNIL CHETNARAYAN UPADHYAY v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1799/2026 · 2026-08-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

57. BA-1799-26.odt Amberkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1799 OF 2026 Sunil Chetnarayan Upadhyay .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................  Mr. Mithilesh Mishra a/w Mr. Pavan Pandey & Mr. Devendra Agarwal i/by Mr. Premkumar Pandey, Advocates for Applicant  Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for State ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : AUGUST 18, 2026 P. C. : 1. Heard Mr. Mishra, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr. Palkar, learned APP for State. 2. Applicant is granted interim bail by the Sessions Court. He has chosen to file the Bail Application before this Court. I direct the Applicant to approach the Sessions Court by filing appropriate Bail Application in accordance with law since Applicant desires to argue on merits. If the Applicant chooses to seek extension of interim bail on medical ground, leave and liberty is granted to the Applicant to do so in accordance with law. 3. In view of the above, present Bail Application is disposed of with liberty to the Applicant to approach the concerned Sessions Court for seeking regular bail. Needless to state that if Bail Application is filed 1 of 2 57. BA-1799-26.odt by Applicant before the Sessions Court, same shall be considered by the learned Sessions Court as expeditiously as possible in view of the medical condition of the Applicant which has been informed to the Court by Mr. Mishra. 4. Bail Application is disposed. Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 2 of 2 RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Digitally signed by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date: 2026.08.18 20:08:12 +0530