Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43565 (CAL)

PRATAY KHELO v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/26016/2025 · 2026-09-25

Sandip Kumar De

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25th Sept., 2026 Item no.DL 67 Court No. 447 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 26016 of 2025 In the matter of : Pratay Khelo ….Petitioner VS. The State of West Bengal & Ors. ….Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Himadri Barua Mr. Biswajit Das ….Advocates For the State Respondent Nos. 1,2 & 6: Mr. Anirudhya Dutta Ms. Kanika Gupta ...Advocates For the Howrah Municipal Corporation : Mr. Ankit Sureka …Advocate 1. Affidavit-of-service filed today be kept on record. 2. The learned Counsel for the Howrah Municipal Corporation submits a report in the form of affidavit. The affidavit discloses that there is construction of a boundary wall on the common passage having approximately height of 1 meter. 3. Since the construction of boundary wall is inside the common passage, the same is outside the purview of the municipal authorities and as such, the steps cannot be taken by the authorities of the Howrah Municipal Corporation. 4. In the circumstances, no order can be passed in the present writ petition. Page 2 5. Accordingly, W.P.A 26016 of 2025 is thus, disposed of. 6. The report in the form of affidavit filed by the Howrah Municipal Corporation is kept on record. 7. There shall be no order as to costs. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. ( Sandip Kumar De, J. )