IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.2195 of 2026 Bimal B. Singh … Petitioner Mr. S.S. Dash, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) : 23.04.2026 01. 1. This is the 2nd successive bail application U/S.483 of the BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Inspector of Excise, Striking Force, Ganjam, Chatrapur PR Case No.70 of 2025-26 corresponding to 2(a)CC Case No. 23 of 2025 (N) pending in the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge- cum-Special Judge, Aska, Ganjam, for commission of offence punishable U/S. 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, on the main allegation of transporting 45Kgs of Contraband Ganja in Bajaj RE Auto bearing Regd. No. OD-07N-5183. 2. Heard, Mr. Sudhanshu Sekhar Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Patra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. On being queried about the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, Mr. Dash volunteers to withhold bail to the petitioner, if he is found to have any criminal antecedents of similar nature for commission of offence under NDPS Act. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner is renewing his prayer for bail purportedly under the changed circumstance of submission of PR, but the petitioner was taken into custody on 17.09.2025, but in the meantime, PR has already been submitted, however, the trial is yet to commence and, therefore, the trial would take some time. Further, it is claimed that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent of similar nature. In the fitness of things and taking into consideration the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, especially when no criminal antecedent of similar nature has been reported against the petitioner, he would be considered to have satisfied the conditions of Section 37 of NDPS Act, if he is not having any criminal antecedent of similar nature for commission of offences under NDPS Act. 4. For the reasons stated hereinabove and taking into account the pre-trial detention of the petitioner in custody, this Court without expressing any view on merit admits the petitioner to bail, but subject to verification of his criminal antecedent of similar nature for commission of offence under the NDPS Act. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it. In view of the specific submission as advanced for the petitioner, the benefit of this order shall not be extended to the petitioner, if he is found to have any criminal antecedent of similar nature for commission of offences under NDPS Act. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference. (G. Satapathy) Judge S.Sasmal Designation: Jr. Stenographer