Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
25.09.2026 Ct. No.446 Sl. No.1 akd
W. P. A. 11442 of 2025
[Mihir Kanjilal & Anr. -Vs- Union of India & Ors.]
Mr. Supratick Syamal Mr. Alokesh Dalai Ms. Rima Mondal Ms. Sawant Chanda
… … for the petitioners
Mr. Debashis Saha
Mr. Avirup Roy Sanyal
Ms. Sucheta Pal
Mr. Jyotishman Sarkar
… … for respondent no. 6
[Bank of India]
Mr. Dipanjan Dutta Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury Ms. Esha Basak
… … for respondent no. 7
[Bank of Baroda]
1. Mr. Syamal, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits that the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed and as such the petitioners do not want to proceed with the instant writ petition. The written instruction submitted on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record.
2. In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
3. There shall be no order as to costs.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)