[2026:RJ-JP:14121] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2675/2026 Aman Yadav @ Sonu S/o Thavarmal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gunti Thana Behror Kotwali, Distt. Kotputli-Behror (At Presently Confined In Distt. Jail Kotputli-Behror). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through the PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Harshita Sharma, for Dr. Mahesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP Ms. Sonam Jakhar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 06/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 148/2025 registered at Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror for offence u/S 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 310(2), 308(2) & 140(3) of the BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the Public Prosecutor. 3. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely because a vehicle used by the other accused is registered in the name of the present accused petitioner. She also submits that the accused petitioner is said to have been in custody since 22.01.2026 and after completion of investigation, the police has [2026:RJ-JP:14121] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2675/2026] submitted charge-sheet in the matter. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner also submits that the co-accused Neeraj @ Boxer has already been enlarged on bail and the case of the present accused petitioner is in no manner distinguishable from the case of the co-accused who has been enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application and submit that involvement of the accused petitioner in commission of the offence is very much clear from the fact that the vehicle which has been used in commission of the offence is registered in the name of the accused petitioner. 5. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and the counsel for the complainant and also perused the challan papers. 6. On perusal of the averments made in the FIR, it is revealed that the accused petitioner has not been named in this report. The accused petitioner is said to have been in custody since 22.01.2026 and after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. The co-accused Neeraj @ Boxer has already been enlarged on bail and in opinion of this Court, the case of the present accused petitioner is in no manner distinguishable from the case of the co-accused. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly to maintain the parity, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this [2026:RJ-JP:14121] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2675/2026] case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /33