Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43548 (KAR)

SRI.S.N.NANJAPPA v. SMT. THIMMAMMA

RP/489/2025 · 2026-09-24

E S Indiresh

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010726682025 NC: 2026:KHC:52894 RP No. 489 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.489 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. S.N.NANJAPPA SON OF LATE NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANABA VILLAGE, AMRUTHUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 111. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.M.SIDDAMALLAPPA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. THIMMAMMA WIFE OF LATE NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANABA VILLAGE, AMRUTHUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 111. 2. SRI. NANJEGOWDA, SON OF LATE NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010726682025 NC: 2026:KHC:52894 RP No. 489 of 2025 RESIDING AT SANABA VILLAGE, AMRUTHUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 111. 3. SRI. KAPANIGOWDA, SON OF LATE NANJUNADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANABA VILLAGE, AMRUTHUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 111. 4. SRI. SHIVARAJA, SON OF LATE NANJUNDALAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT SANABA VILLAGE, AMRUTHUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 111. 5. SRI. SRIKANTHA, SON OF LATE NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANABA VILLAGE, AMRUTHUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 111. 6. SRI. DEVARAJA, SON OF LATE NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANABA VILLAGE, AMRUTHUR HOBLI, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010726682025 NC: 2026:KHC:52894 RP No. 489 of 2025 KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 111. 7. SRI. JAGADEESH, SON OF LATE NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANABA VILLAGE, AMRUTHUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 111. 8. SMT. PADMA, DAUGHTER OF LATE NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANABA VILLAGE, AMRUTHUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 111. 9. S.N. JAYAMMA, SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS. SRI. PUNITH B., SON OF LATE JAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, C/O BALAKRISHNA C.T. RESIDING AT NO.114, TUBINIKERE, AMRUTHUR POST, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572111. 10. SMT. SUNITHA B. D/O LATE JAYAMMA, W/O LATE R. VENKATESH, - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010726682025 NC: 2026:KHC:52894 RP No. 489 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.55, 6TH 'B' CROSS, NEAR PUSHPA BAR, CHOWDESHWARINAGAR, LAGGERE, BENGALURU – 560058. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDARAMAIAH V.B., ADVOCATE) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.09.2025 PASSED IN RSA NO.473/2016. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is seeking review of the Judgment and Decree dated 16.09.2025 in RSA No.473/2016, as per Annexure-A to the Writ Petition. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner with regard to seeking review of the impugned order dated 16.09.2025 (Annexure-A), after considering the reasons - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010726682025 NC: 2026:KHC:52894 RP No. 489 of 2025 assigned at paragraph Nos.16 and 17 of the Judgment and Decree dated 16.09.2025 (Annexure-A), I am of the opinion that, no interference is called for in this Review Petition as there is no error apparent on the face of the record. 3. In that view of the matter, following the declaration of law made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of SHRI RAM SAHU (DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES AND OTHERS Vs. VINOD KUMAR RAWAT AND OTHERS reported in (2021) 13 SCC 1, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44