Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43530 (MAD)

Malini v. The Inspector of police

CRL OP/16110/2026 · 2026-07-01

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.O.P.No.16110 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-07-2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.O.P.No.16110 of 2026 Malini W/o Thiyagarajan, No.127, B Block, Gandhi Nagar, Chennai-02 ..Petitioner Vs 1) The State rep by. The Inspector of Police W2, All Women police station, Triplicane, Chennai 600 002 Crime No.01/2022 2) Arun Kumar, S/o Nagaraj, No.180, B-Block, Gandhi Nagar, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600 002 ..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to accept this affidavit of Joint Compromise and quash the criminal proceedings in Spl.SC.No.116/2023 in Crime no.1 of 2022. For Petitioner: Ms.L.Meenakshi For Respondent: Mr.Mohamed Riyaz, Government Advocate (Criminal side) For R1 *** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No.16110 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the final report and proceedings in Special S.C.No.116 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Special Judge for POCSO cases, Mahila Court, Chennai. 2. Upon consideration of the allegations contained in the First Information Report (F.I.R.), it can be seen that the victim child developed a love affair when she was only 16 years of age with the accused and they also went away resulting in a physical relationship. Accordingly, a case was registered under Section 5 read with Sections 6 & 9 of the POCSO Act and the case is pending till date. 3. Today, both the accused as well as the victim child are present before this Court. The victim child has crossed 18 years of age and it is stated that she has married the accused and they are living as husband and wife and are eking out a lawful livelihood. They have also got two children born out of the wed- lock. The victim submits that she doesn't want to pursue the allegations and she would pray that this Court to quash the case. 4. Though normally in serious offences such as the one under the POCSO Act, this Court would not go by the version of the prosecutrix of the victim https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No.16110 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 child alone, on an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the age of the victim child at the time of the occurrence and the fact that they are now living as husband and wife and the welfare of their two children is also at stake, I am of the view that in the extraordinary and peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, this Court shall exercise the jurisdiction under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition filed stands allowed and the final report and all further proceedings in Special S.C.No.116 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Special Judge for POCSO cases, Mahilla Court, Chennai stands quashed. 01-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No sts To: 1) The learned Special Judge for POCSO cases, Mahilla Court, Chennai 2) The Inspector of Police W-2,All Women police station, Triplicane, Chennai 600 002 [Crime No.01/2022] 3) The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No.16110 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. sts Order made in CRL.O.P.No.16110 of 2026 Dated: 01-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis