Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43523 (KAR)

SMT SHEELA v. SRI JAGADISH NAYAK

WP/16340/2024 · 2026-09-28

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010344032024 NC: 2026:KHC:54200 WP No. 16340 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION No.16340 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT SHEELA W/O A.N. RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT BETTAHALLI VILLAGE, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK-561 101. 2. ABHISHEK S/O LATE LANKESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, RESIDING AT VEERASAGARA VILLAGE, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK-561 101. 3. SANTHOSH S/O. JAGANNATH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT YESHWANTHAPURA, BENGALURU-560 022. 4. SMT. JAYALAKSHMI W/O LATE MANOJI RAO AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT BETTAHALLI VILLAGE, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK-561 101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMACHANDRA M B, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010344032024 NC: 2026:KHC:54200 WP No. 16340 of 2024 AND: 1. SRI JAGADISH NAYAK PSI, KUDUR POLICE STATION, KUDUR-561 101. 2. THE TAHASILDAR AND EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, PIN CODE-562 120. (REP. BY LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001) …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.WAHEEDA.M.M, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO QUASH THE PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT 112/2023 DATED 16/11/2023 UNDER 107 OF CRPC SUBMITTED BY THE R1 AS PER ANNEXURE-E, SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED ONLY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed the memo which reads as under: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010344032024 NC: 2026:KHC:54200 WP No. 16340 of 2024 “The petitioners have challenged the preventive action report filed by the respondent No.1 and proceedings initiated by the respondent No.2 on 13.11.23 now more than 2 ½ years is elapsed hence as per Section 107 Cr.P.C. only 6 months validity. In view of the same the above petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.” 2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50 CT:VRR