- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010229302024 NC: 2026:KHC:52565 WP No. 13893 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 13893 OF 2024 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: MALLAMMA W/O LATE ERAIAH AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, MALLESHPURA VILLAGE HALEKOTE HOBLI TALUK - HOLENARASIPURA DISTRICT HASSAN PIN CODE-573 211. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NIKHIL S.K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SOMASHEKAR KASHIMATH.,ADVOCATES) AND: RENUKA DEAD BY LR'S 1. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 2. SHIVKUMAR S/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, BOTH RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 R/O MALLESHPURA VILLAGE, HALEKOTE HOBLI, TALUK - HOLENARSIPURA Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010229302024 NC: 2026:KHC:52565 WP No. 13893 of 2024 DISTRICT - HASSAN PIN CODE-573 211. 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN - DISTRICT HASSAN-573 201. 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HASSAN - DISTRICT HASSAN-573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NITISH .,ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.V. NARASIMHAN., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SMT. SAVITHRAMMA., AGA FOR R3 TO R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Somashekar Kashimath., counsel for the petitioners; Sri.Nitish., counsel on behalf of Sri.K.V.Narasimhan., for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Smt.Savithramma., Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 to 5 appeared in person. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010229302024 NC: 2026:KHC:52565 WP No. 13893 of 2024 2. The petition is filed seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner. This order is challenged in this writ petition on several grounds as set out in the memorandum of the writ petition. 3. Counsel appearing for the respective parties advanced several contentions. Counsel for the petitioner submits that that the order directing resumption of the land in favor of the Government is wholly untenable. Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits the Deputy Commissioner ought to have confirmed the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner and directed resumption of the land in favor of respondents 1 and 2. Urging additional grounds, counsel submits that the writ petition is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed. 4. I have heard the counsel for the parties and carefully perused the material available on record. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010229302024 NC: 2026:KHC:52565 WP No. 13893 of 2024 5. Since this Court has already allowed W.P.No.11613/2024 in favor of the purchasers in respect of the subject property, no further relief survives for consideration in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. On dismissal of the Writ Petition, any interim order stands discharged, and any pending interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32.1