Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4350 (HP)

RASHMI RAJPUT v. M/S SHAKTI STEEL COMPANY

CRMPM/725/2026 · 2026-04-30

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RASHMI RAJPUT Versus M/S SHAKTI STEEL COMPANY CRMPM-725 of 2026 30.04.2026 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. CRMPM-725 of 2026 For the reasons stated in application, which is duly supported by way of affidavit, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying criminal revision petition is neither intentional nor deliberate, rather same has occurred on account of the circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant/petitioner and as such, delay in filing the petition, which in my considered view has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No._______ of 2026 Be registered. Notice to respondent be issued, on taking steps within a period of one week, returnable within six weeks. Cr.MP No.____of 2026 (CRMPST/2897/2026) Be registered. Notice in aforesaid terms. Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing. In the meantime, substantive sentence imposed by the learned Court below shall remain suspended, subject to applicant/petitioner’s depositing 50% of the compensation amount and furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court within a period of four weeks. April 30, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge