Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4350 (BOM)

HEENA QASIM PHOPLUNKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

IA/6237/2026 · 2026-08-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

8-IA-6237-2026-IN-WP-1746-2026.DOC Shephali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6237 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1746 OF 2026 Heena Qasim Phoplunkar ...Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Heena Qasim Phoplunkar & Ors. …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents Mr Siddheshwar N. Biradar, with Rahul Wani, for the Applicant. Mr PP Kakade, for the Respondent No. 2-MPSC. Ms Kavita N. Solunke, Addl. GP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATED: 18th AUGUST 2026. PC:- 1. By referring to the order dated 12th August 2026, Ms Kavita Solunke, learned Additional Government Pleader submits that not only has the recommendation been made in favour of the Petitioner by the MPSC but the Government has also issued an order in favour of the Petitioner on 14th August 2026. Therefore, the Interim Application has become infructuous. Mr Biradar, learned counsel for the Petitioner does not dispute the said position. SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2026.08.19 10:01:22 +0530 8-IA-6237-2026-IN-WP-1746-2026.DOC 2. In view of the above, the Interim Application is disposed as as infructuous. (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) {