- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010402492026 NC: 2026:KHC:52651 WP No. 18277 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 18277 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT KAMAKKA, W/O LATE MARANNA, AGE ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKANNAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYANA DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU - 572 138. 2. SRI. YATHIRAJ, S/O LATE MARANNA, AGE ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKANNAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYANA DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU - 572 138. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MURALI D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MADHUGIRI SUB - DIVISION, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KORATEGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 138. Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010402492026 NC: 2026:KHC:52651 WP No. 18277 of 2026 3. REVENUE INSPECTOR, CHIKKANNANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYANA DURGA HOBLI, KORATEGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU - 572 138. 4. SRI. MUDUPAIAH S/O LATE MARANNA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT, CHIKKANNANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYANA DURGA HOBLI, KORATEGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU - 572 138. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO.2 AND THE CONCERNED REVENUE AUTHORITIES TO IMPLEMENT AND GIVE EFFECT TO THE ORDER DATED 23.05.2025 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 IN R.A. NO.35/2024, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A, BY EFFECTING KHATA AND REVENUE ENTRIES IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS AS THE LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED MARANNA IN RESPECT OF SY. NO.29/4 SITUATED AT CHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYANA DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010402492026 NC: 2026:KHC:52651 WP No. 18277 of 2026 ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, petitioners are assailing the proceedings under Section 136(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 in R.A.No.35/2024 passed by respondent No.1 at Annexure-A. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that, petitioners are having an efficacious remedy under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. In that view of the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the Competent Authority by way of revision, the writ petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22