Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./88475/2025 · 2026-02-10
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43483 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43483 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88475 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2022 Thana- KHODAWANDPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Singh S/o- Baliram Singh Village- 204 Awadh Residency B Block 2nd Floor SK Puram opposite lalu yadav khatal, PS- Danapur District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 506, 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3 . The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other named co-accused persons, cheated the informant for a sum of Rs. 11,59,350/- in lieu providing job of Group ‘D’ in the Indian Railways.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that as per F.I.R. Rs. 30,000/- was transferred in the account of this petitioner for the alleged job . It is further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88475 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 submitted that he has already refunded the aforesaid amount in the bank account of informant through Google pay as on 06.09.2025 vide UPI transaction ID 524956168300. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail.
6. Considering the fact that petitioner has already refunded the alleged amount in the account of informant, materials available on record and circumstances of the case , this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J M Ist Class, Manjhaul ( Begusarai ) District- Begusarai in connection with Khodawandpur (Chhourahi O.P.) P. S. Case No. 10 of 2022 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure .
Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T