Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86010 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-400 Year-2022 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ======================================================
1. Nagendra Chaudhary son of Harihar Choudhary Resident of Village- Susadi, Police Station- Samjhauli, District- Rohtas
2. Raju Kumar @ Raju Chaudhary Son of Sri Nagendra chaudhary Resident of Village- Susadi, Police Station- Samjhauli, District- Rohtas
3. Munna Kumar son of Sri Nagendra Chaudhary Resident of Village- Susadi, Police Station- Samjhauli, District- Rohtas
4. Sonu Kumar Son of Sri Nagendra chaudhary Resident of Village- Susadi, Police Station- Samjhauli, District- Rohtas
5. Smt. Laxmina Devi Wife of Sri Nagendra Chaudhary Resident of Village- Susadi, Police Station- Samjhauli, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Krishna Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 07-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 366(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is alleged that co-accused Bittu Kumar kidnapped the daughter of the informant and these petitioners are alleged to have assisted co-accused Bittu Kumar in commission of alleged offence.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86010 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026 2/2
4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that the victim, in her statement recorded under Sections 180 & 183 B.N.S.S., has denied the factum of kidnapping and stated that she had already solemnized marriage with co-accused Bittu Kumar in a temple. Petitioners are family members of co- accused Bittu Kumar and claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.
6. Considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S. and clean antecedent of petitioners, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 1st Sasaram at Rohtas in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 400 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
anay/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T