Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43459 (PAT)

Ramayan Sahni @ Ramayan Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./88629/2025 · 2026-02-10

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88629 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2024 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ramayan Sahni @ Ramayan Chaudhary Son of Late Jokhu Sahni Resident of Village - Dakshni Telhua Pokhra Tola, Ward No.- 07, P.S.- Nautan, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State . 2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC . 3 . As per FIR, all the named accused persons including this petitioner killed the daughter of the informant and cremated her body . Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88629 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/3 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is the specific case of the informant that named accused persons killed the daughter of informant. The name of the petitioner transpired during course of investigation in the confessional statement of other co- accused persons. Save and except, confessional statement, there is no other material on record to show the complicity of this petitioner in the alleged occurrence . There is no allegation against the petitioner that he has participated in the murder of the deceased. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Similarly co- accused persons have already been granted bail by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 17.11.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 76443 of 2025 . 5 . Learned counsel for the State opposes the bail petition . 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, clean antecedent of the petitioner and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate West champaran Bettiah in connection with Nautan Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88629 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 3/3 P.S. Case No. 191 of 2024 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 . Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T