WP No. 23678 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 23678 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.25643 of 2026 Tvl. RK Technology (GSTIN- 33ABJPU5028L1ZA), rep by proprietor Subramani Umadevi , Office at Ground floor Y-109, North of Perur, Kumarapalayam village Perur, Coimbatore 641010 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy State tax officer 2 Perur circle, coimbatore 2. The Deputy Commercial tax officer Perur Coimbatore I ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for the records pertaining to the order dated 15.11.2025 in GSTIN 33ABJPU5028L1ZA /2021-22 passed by 1st respondent, and the consequential Order dated 15.11.2025 in Reference No. ZD3311252689752 (Form-DRC -07) passed by the 2nd respondent, and quash the same, and consequentially direct the respondents to de-freeze the bank account bearing Account No. 65723070000476, Canara Bank, Perur Branch. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23678 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.K Sathish Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ******** ORDER An order dated 15.11.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23678 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the bank attachment shall stand raised. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 02-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To 1. The Deputy State tax officer 2 Perur circle, coimbatore 2. The Deputy Commercial tax officer Perur Coimbatore I https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23678 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 23678 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.25643 of 2026 02-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis