Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43439 (PAT)

Pramod Das v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./88459/2025 · 2026-01-15

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88459 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2025 Thana- Madhusudanpur District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1. Pramod Das S/O Aukat Das R/o Village- Gobindpur, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District-Bhagalpur 2. Sabita Devi W/O Pramod Das R/o Village- Gobindpur, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District-Bhagalpur 3. Sanjiv Kumar S/O Pramod Das R/o Village- Gobindpur, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District-Bhagalpur 4. Nitish Kumar S/O Pramod Das R/o Village- Gobindpur, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District-Bhagalpur 5. Sonu Kumar S/O Pramod Das R/o Village- Gobindpur, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District-Bhagalpur 6. Sangita Kumari @ Sangita Devi W/O Sanjiv Kumar R/o Village- Gobindpur, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District-Bhagalpur 7. Payal Mina @ Payal Devi W/O Sonu Kumar R/o Village- Gobindpur, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District-Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ambrish Kr Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Madhusudanpur P.S. Case No. 73 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 126(2)/ 115(2)/ 117(2)/ 303(2)/ 74/ 352/ 351(2)(3)/ 3(5) of B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88459 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 armed with swords and lathis assaulted the informant’s parents and brother over a land dispute, causing head injuries. They allegedly snatched a gold chain, issued threats, and the injured were treated in Bhagalpur hospital. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that the parties have settled their dispute. Petitioners have clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application on behalf of petitioner nos. 2, 6 and 7 stand allowed. 7. Let the petitioner nos. 2, 6 and 7, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Bhagalpur/ concerned Court below in connection with Madhusudanpur P.S. Case No. 73 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS. 8. So far as petitioner nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 are Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88459 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 concerned , their application is disposed of with liberty to move before the learned court below. The learned court below shall verify the compromise, if any, and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T