Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43439 (KAR)

K.V. SRINIVASA v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/28895/2026 · 2026-09-24

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010633362026 NC: 2026:KHC:52892 WP No. 28895 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 28895 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: K.V. SRINIVASA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS. 1. SMT. SUDHA K.P W/O LATE K.V. SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS. 2. SRI. SUHAS K.S. S/O LATE K.V. SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. 3. SRI. SUSHMITHA K.S. S/O LATE K.V. SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT KOOTAGAL VILLAGE, KOOTAGAL HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT - 562 159. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ASHOKA T., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010633362026 NC: 2026:KHC:52892 WP No. 28895 of 2026 AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT, BENGALURU – 560 041. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION, RAMANAGARA-562159. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA-562159. 4. SRI. HANUMAIAH S/O LATE K.H. CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, 3RD CROSS, MARUTI NILAYA, WARD NO. 27, VIVEKANANDANAGARA, RAYARADODDI, RAMANAGARA - 562 159. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 19-05-2026 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 (DEPUTY COMMISSIONER) IN REVISION PETITION NO.RP/120/2025 (ANNEXURE-F); AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010633362026 NC: 2026:KHC:52892 WP No. 28895 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. Ashoka T., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and to approach the Civil Court to establish right over the property in question and accordingly, recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31