Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43407 (PAT)

Sunil Sahni v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./6351/2026 · 2026-01-30

Nawneet Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6351 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2024 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Sunil Sahni S/O Sri Madan Sahni Resident of village- Mashrakh South tola, P.S.- Mashrakh, District- Saran 2. Avishek Sahni @ Abhishek Sahni @ Abhishek Kumar Sahni S/O Sri Sunil Sahni Resident of village- Mashrakh South tola, P.S.- Mashrakh, District- Saran 3. Atul Sahni @ Atul Kumar @ Atul Kumar Sahni S/O Sri Sunil Sahni Resident of village- Mashrakh South tola, P.S.- Mashrakh, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 30-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 293 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 506, 354, 379/34 of the IPC. 3. The specific allegation against the petitioners is that they assaulted the informant on the head and left palm with an iron rod. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The injuries are simple in nature. He has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6351 of 2026(3) dt.30-01-2026 2/2 further submitted that the co-accused, Ram Ishwar Sahni, along with other co-accused persons against whom there is allegation of inflicting assault, have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court and the case of the petitioners is on better footing. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-VII, Saran at Chapra/concerned court in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 293 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Nirmal/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T