25.09.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.22 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (M) 1866 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Kaliganj Police Station Case No. 627 of 2025 dated 27.07.2025 under Sections 118(2)/109/103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In Re : Parimal Rajwar ... Petitioner. Ms. Minoti Gomes ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Priyankar Ganguly, Ms. Shalini Bairagi ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for 1 year 2 months; charge- sheet has been submitted and charges have already been framed. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the nature of the injury being inflicted at the behest of the present petitioner. Having considered the injury report, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at this stage. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the process of trial and complete the evidence of vulnerable witnesses preferably within a period of one year from date. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 1866 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. 2 All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)