Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4340 (JHR)

BAHURAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1912/2026 · 2026-03-13

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6784 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1912 of 2026 --------- 1. Bahuran Singh, aged about 53 years, son of late Raghuwar Singh, resident of village Rokerhega, P.O. Palkot, P.S. Palkot, District Gumla, State Jharkhand. 2. Ravindra Singh, aged about 30 years, son of late Raghuwar Singh, resident of village Rokerhega, P.O. Palkot, P.S. Palkot, District Gumla, State Jharkhand. 3. Jaidev Singh, aged about 23 years, son of Bahuran Singh, resident of village Rokerhega, P.O. Palkot, P.S. Palkot, District Gumla, State Jharkhand. 4. Shivshankar Singh, aged about 47 years, son of Lotan Singh, resident of village Rokerhega, P.O. Palkot, P.S. Palkot, District Gumla, State Jharkhand. ....Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. P.K. Chatterjee, A.P.P. --------- 02/ 13.03.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioners for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 9, 17(G), 27, 29, 39(1B), 44, 48(B), 49(B) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent, have not committed any offence and have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that there are no independent witnesses to search, seizure and recovery, and therefore, entire case becomes doubtful. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. He further submits that petitioners are languishing in custody since 23.12.2025; as such, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 2026:JHHC:6784 2 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation against the petitioners; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla, in connection with Complaint Case No. 04/2026. 6. It is made clear that the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioners, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 13th March, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 16.03.2026