[2026:RJ-JP:12127] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 3774/2026 1. Mohanram S/o Gayadram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Balada, Police Station Anandpur Kalu, District Beawar. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Beawar). 2. Pramod Kumar S/o Udailal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Kanda, Police Station Bhilwara Sadar, District Bhilwara. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Beawar). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/03/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this second bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.504/2025 registered at Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar for offences under Sections 8 and 15 of NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioners is that 45 kg of poppy straw was recovered from their conscious [2026:RJ-JP:12127] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3774/2026] possession, which is below the commercial quantity. Though five criminal antecedents of different nature have been reported against petitioner Mohanram and four criminal antecedents including one of similar nature are pending against petitioner Pramod Kumar but in all such cases they have been enlarged on bail. Petitioners are behind the bars since 26.12.2025 and 28.12.2025 respectively. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Mohanram S/o Gayadram and Pramod Kumar S/o Udailal, be released on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/76