SMT. JAYASHREE v. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
MFA/5243/2023 · 2026-09-29
D K Singh, H Shanthi Bhushan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43380 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43380 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010390102023 NC: 2026:KHC:54216-DB MFA No. 5243 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5243 OF 2023 (ECA) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. JAYASHREE W/O LATE C VINAYAN @ PC VINAYAN AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
2. ADITHYAN S/O LATE C VINAYAN @ P C VINAYAN
3.
AADHYA P V D/O LATE C VINAYAN @ P C VINAYAN
ALL ARE R/AT #10, BHUVANESHWARI LAYOUT, NAGANATHAPURA BENGALURU 560 100
APPELLANT NO. 2 AND 3 ARE MINORS AND REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN APPELLANT NO. 1 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ABHINAY Y T., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010390102023 NC: 2026:KHC:54216-DB MFA No. 5243 of 2023
AND:
1.
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, ISSUING OFFICER 5/111 AND 6/111 I FLOOR, I BLOCK DR RAJKUMAR ROAD, ( I MAIN ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU 560 10
2.
HEMANTH R S/O RAMACHADRA REDDY #19, 1 CROSS, 26th MAIN, HSR LAYOUT, SECTION 1 BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALRUU 560 012 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRADEEP B., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R2 SERVED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 30(1) EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.06.2023 PASSED IN ECA NO.3/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDITINAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MEMBER, MACT-7, BENGALURU, SCCH-7, DISMISSING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010390102023 NC: 2026:KHC:54216-DB MFA No. 5243 of 2023
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
There is no representation either by learned counsel appellants or the appellants, neither in the first call nor in the revised call.
2. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE
NG CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35