Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43378 (KAR)

SRI. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/24232/2022 · 2026-09-24

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010558412022 NC: 2026:KHC:52953 WP No. 24232 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 24232 OF 2022 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: SRI. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O. LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, SONNAPANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADEESHA K.J., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU-560001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU-560001. 4. SRI. S.E.M. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O. LATE E.MUNISHAMAPPA, SONNAPANAHALLI VILLAGE, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010558412022 NC: 2026:KHC:52953 WP No. 24232 of 2022 JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK PIN-562127. 5. SMT. JANAKI SINCE DEAD BY LRS SRI. PRAKASH GANGARAM, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O. LATE N.GANGARAM,. NO.17, ABSHOT LAYOUT, SANKEY ROAD CROSS, BENGALURU-560052. 6. SRI. N.SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O. LATE N.NINGAIAH NO.8/1A, SHIVAKRUPA, KEMPANNA ROAD, BENGALURU-560004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; R4 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; SRI. MITHUN G.A., ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010558412022 NC: 2026:KHC:52953 WP No. 24232 of 2022 The petition was listed on 13.08.2026. On that day also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the petition was ordered to be listed today. When the matter is taken up today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10