IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No. 124 of 2026 Date of Decision: 30.04.2026 Lalit Sen ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bonit, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, or respondent No. 4. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes before this Court that the judgment sought to be executed has been stayed by the Division Bench of this Court. In view of this, he does not want to press the present petition. However, he may be granted liberty to file the same at an appropriate stage. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:14253 ) 2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed. 3. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Jiya Lal Bhardwaj) Judge 30th April, 2026 (sushma)