- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010494812022 NC: 2026:KHC:54262 RPFC No. 262 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 262 OF 2022 BETWEEN: RANGANATH @ RANGEGOWDA S/O PERAME GOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT ANNAPOORNESHWARI MESS 6TH MAIN ROAD, HVR LAYOUT KAMAKSHIPALYA BANGALORE -79 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHANKUMARA D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SUMA W/O RANGANATH @ RANGEOGWDA D/O JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 2. MANOJ S/O RANGANATH @ RANGEOGWDA AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS 3. PRAJWAL S/O RANGANATH @ RANGEOGOWDA AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER SUMA RESPONDENT NO.1 Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010494812022 NC: 2026:KHC:54262 RPFC No. 262 of 2022 ALL ARE R/AT AGRAGARA, GAJANUR POST SHIVAMOGGA TALUK …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASAD B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS RPFC FILED U/S.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.03.2022 PASSED IN Crl. MISC.NO.163/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, SHIVAMOGGA ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.125 OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER A report dated 25.09.2026 on settlement is received from the Senior Civil Judge and Member Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Shivamogga, wherein it is stated that on 21.09.2025 both the parties and their learned advocates appeared before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Shivamogga and filed a joint memo, reporting that both the parties have reunited and that they are residing together. As such, the settlement of the dispute is reported, and the parties have appeared before the Lok-Adalat, where the case bearing Crl.Misc.No.82/2022 was posted, and have submitted the - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010494812022 NC: 2026:KHC:54262 RPFC No. 262 of 2022 settlement of the dispute in the presence of both advocates. In light of the fact that the parties are reunited and the dispute is settled amicably, this court is passing the following: ORDER i. Accordingly, the RPFC is dismissed. ii. If there is no such settlement, the party is at liberty to file application to seeking to revive this petition. iii. Pending IAs., in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29 *MR