Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11498] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2611/2024 Shreemati Resham Devi W/o Kailash Choudhary, Aged About 41 Years, R/o House No. 327, Shreeram Taila Rajeev Nagar , Kachi Basti Lakapuri, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus Subhash Saraf Subhash Saraf R.p. Jewellers, Lg-9 Krishan Krapa-3, Subhash Nagar Shopping Center Jaipur Through Proprietor/partnership Shree Ramgopal. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ayush Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Kumar Jain, Adv. HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 18/03/2026 vihykFkhZ&nkosnkj ¼vkxs ^^nkosnkj^^ dgk tkosxk½ dh vksj ls ;g vihy /kkjk 30 deZdkj {kfriwfrZ vf/kfu;e] 1923 ¼vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e&1923^^ dgk tkosxk½ ds rgr fo}ku U;k;ky; vk;qDr deZpkjh {kfriwfrZ vf/kfu;e] 1923 t;iqj }kjk izdj.k E.C.C./F./66/2010 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 05-04-2024 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS ftlds ek/;e ls vihykFkhZ dh Dyse ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh x;hA orZeku ekeys esa ;g fookn jfgr gS fd nkosnkj dk iq= e`rd jkeorkj izR;FkhZ ds ;gka deZdkj ds :i esa fu;ksftr Fkk rFkk fnukad 05-10-2009 dks e`rd dh vlkekftd rF;ksa }kjk tUrj eUrj ds ikl gR;k dj nh x;hA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ;g fu"d"kZ fn;k x;k gS fd ?kVuk LFky tUrj eUrj ij e`rd dh mifLFkfr fu;kstu ds nkSjku ugha Fkh vkSj bl vk/kkj ij Dyse ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh x;h gSA
[2026:RJ-JP:11498] (2 of 4) [CMA-2611/2024] fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk fuosnu gS fd miyC/k lk{; ds vk/kkj ij ;g LI"V gS fd izR;FkhZ&fu;kstd }kjk e`rd dks viuh QeZ ls ihrfy;ksa ds pkSd dh rjQ lkeku fMyhoj djus ds fy, Hkstk Fkk] jkLrs esa T;knk HkhM gksus ls FkksMk lk ekxZ ifjorZu djrs gq, e`rd tUrj eUrj okys jkLrs ij pyk x;k Fkk] ysfdu ;g Lohd`r gS fd rRle; og izR;FkhZ ds fu;kstu esa dk;Z dj jgk Fkk] ijarq fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk laiw.kZ lk{; dks utj vUnkt djrs gq, vihyk/khu fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gS] tks vikLr gksus o Dyse ;kfpdk Lohdkj gksus ;ksX; gSA fodYi esa ekeyk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks izfrizsf"kr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ dk fuosnu gS fd Lo;a e`rd ds firk dSyk'k us viuh lk{; esa Lohdkj fd;k gS fd ihrfy;ksa ds pkSd esa tkus gsrq jkLrs esa tUrj eUrj ugha vkrk gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa Li"V gS fd ?kVuk LFky ij e`rd dh mifLFkfr mlds fu;kstu ls i`Fkd o vlacaf/kr Fkh vkSj ,slh fLFkfr esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; dks fof/k lEer gksuk crkrs gq, vihy [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd bl ekeys esa fof/k dk dksbZ lkjoku iz'u vUroZfyr ugha gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa ^^vf/kfu;e&1923^^ dh /kkjk&30 ds izko/kku rFkk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation Vs.
Smt. Sujatha (2019) 11 SCC 514 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr U;kf;d fu.kZ; North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Sujatha (Supra) ds lqlaxr iSjk la[;k&9] 10] 11 rFkk 12 fuEukuqlkj gS&
9. At the outset, we may take note of the fact, being a settled principle, that the question as to whether the employee met with an accident, whether the accident occurred during the course of employment, whether it arose out of an employment, how and in what manner the accident occurred, who was negligent in causing the accident, whether there existed any relationship of employee and employer, what was the age and monthly
[2026:RJ-JP:11498] (3 of 4) [CMA-2611/2024] salary of the employee, how many are the dependents of the deceased employee, the extent of disability caused to the employee due to injuries suffered in an accident, whether there was any insurance coverage obtained by the employer to cover the incident etc. are some of the material issues which arise for the just decision of the Commissioner in a claim petition when an employee suffers any bodily injury or dies during the course of his employment and he/his LRs sue/s his employer to claim compensation under the Act. 10. The afore-mentioned questions are essentially the questions of fact and, therefore, they are required to be proved with the aid of evidence. Once they are proved either way, the findings recorded thereon are regarded as the findings of fact. 11. The appeal provided under Section 30 of the Act to the High Court against the order of the Commissioner lie only against the specific orders set out in clause (a) to (e) of Section 30 of the Act with a further rider contained in first proviso to the Section that the appeal must involve substantial question of law. 12. In other words, the appeal provided under Section 30 of the Act to the High Court against the order of the Commissioner is not like a Regular First Appeal akin to Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 which can be heard both on facts and law. The appellate jurisdiction of the High Court to decide the appeal is confined only to examine the substantial questions of law arising in the case.
mijksDr fu.kZ; esa izfrikfnr fof/kd O;oLFkk rFkk vf/kfu;e&1923 dh /kkjk 30 ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj Li"V gS fd fof/k dk lkjoku iz'u vUroZfyr gksus ij gh vihy lquokbZ gsrq xzg.k dh tk ldrh gSA orZeku ekeys esa izR;FkhZ&fu;kstd dk ;g cpko gS fd e`rd dks cgqewY; lkexzh ysdj lqiqnZ djus o izkIr djus gsrq ihrfy;ksa ds pkSd Hkstk x;k Fkk] ysfdu mlds }kjk funsZ'kksa ds foijhr tkdj tUrj eUrj dh rjQ izLFkku fd;k] tUrj eUrj ij e`rd dh mifLFkfr fu;kstu ls vlacaf/kr FkhA **vfuf/ku;e&1923** dh /kkjk 3 (B)(ii) esa ;g izko/kku fd;k x;k gS fd ;fn deZdkj }kjk fu;ksDrk ds vkns'k dh vogsyuk dh tkrh gS vkSj ml ds vuqdze esa dksbZ ?kVuk ?kfVr gksrh gS rks Dyse ;kfpdk iks"k.kh; ugha gSA orZeku ekeys esa e`rd ds firk dSyk'k }kjk lk{; esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS fd ihrfy;ksa ds pkSd tkdj vkus esa tUrj eUrj ugha vkrk gS] vr%
[2026:RJ-JP:11498] (4 of 4) [CMA-2611/2024] ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g rks Li"V gS fd tUrj eUrj ij e`rd dh mifLFkfr mlds fu;kstu dk;Z ls vlacaf/kr gksdj i`Fkd FkhA nq?kZVuk fu;kstu dky esa gqbZ gS vFkok ugha] ;g fo"k; ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation ¼iwoksZDr½ esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj rF;ksa dk iz'u gS] ftl ij fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us nksuksa i{kksa dh lk{; ij fopkj djus ds mijkUr vihyk/khu fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gS] fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k egRoiw.kZ lk{; dks utj vankt dj viuk fu"d"kZ fn;k gks vFkok tks rF; vfHkys[k ij Fks gh ugha] mu ij fopkj djus ds mijkUr euekuk fu.kZ; fn;k gks] ,slh fLFkfr vfHkys[k ij ugha gSA mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fof/k dk dksbZ lkjoku iz'u bl ekeys esa vUroZfyr ugha gS] bl izdkj U;kf;d fu.kZ; North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation ¼iwoksZDr½ esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk rFkk vf/kfu;e &1923 dh /kkjk&30 ds vuqlkj ;g vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gksus ls [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA rnuqlkj vihyk/khu fu.kZ; fnukad 05-04-2024 dh iqf"V djrs gq, ;g vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gSaA fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k ;fn izkIr gks j[kk gS rks bl vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks izsf"kr fd;k tkosA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Murari Lal Sharma /20