- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010762712011 NC: 2026:KHC:53771 RFA No. 1927 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1927 OF 2011 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: H K SURYANARAYANA S/O LATE KARIGIRI BATTA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O BYCHAPURA ROAD, MAGADI-562 120 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. T.A.RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE AND SRI. MOIDEEN IRSHAD, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. G GOVINDA REDDY SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS, 1(A) SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, W/O. LATE C.GOVINDA REDDY, 1(B) SMT. ANITHA G., AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, D/O. LATE C.GOVINDA REDDY, 1(C) SMT. MANJULA RAJASHEKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D/O. LATE C.GOVINDA REDDY, RESIDING AT NO.401, 'SRI MARUTHI ENCLAVE' RAVIPRAKASH NAGAR, KONENA AGRAHARA, BEHIND RAJESHWARI THEATRE, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010762712011 NC: 2026:KHC:53771 RFA No. 1927 of 2011 BENGALURU-560017. 1(D) SRI. G.BHARATH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O. LATE C.GOVINDA REDDY, 1(A), 1(B) AND 1(D) ARE RESIDING AT NO.25, MAYILLU, 8TH CROSS, BENDRE NAGAR, PURANDARADASA ROAD, BANASHANKARI II STAGE, BENGALURU-560070. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE AND SMT. ANITHA G., ADVOCATE FOR R1 (A TO D)) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 25.09.2026, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant it was ordered to be - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010762712011 NC: 2026:KHC:53771 RFA No. 1927 of 2011 listed on 28.09.2026 and it was also made clear that if none appears for the appellant on the next date of hearing, the appeal would be dismissed for non-prosecution. The appeal is listed today. A perusal of the appeal papers would reflect that the appeal is filed in 2011. Now we are in 2026. The appeal is pending for fifteen years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 111