Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43288 (MAD)

Manojkumar v. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/16602/2026 · 2026-07-01

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.O.P.No.16602 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-07-2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.O.P.No.16602 of 2026 Manojkumar S/o.Gajendran, No.9, Sarangapani Street, Sivapoodham, Vanagaram, Chennai -95. Now at No.9/2, Venkatraman Nagar, Duraisamy Reddy First Street, Korattur, Thiruvallur, TN - 600080. ..Petitioner Vs 1. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, T4 Maduravoyal Police Station, Chennai, Transferred to The Inspector of Police, W-33, All Women Police Station, Virugambakkam, Chennai. Crime No.02 of 2023 2. R.S.Amshumathi D/o.R.Sathishbabu, Residing at Castle 222 Flats, D.No.46/09, 25th Street TNHB, Korattur, Chennai - 600 080. ..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to call for the entire proceedings in C.C.No.743 of 2023, pending before the Learned Judicial Magistrate - II, Poonamallee, and quash the same on joint compromise and thus render justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No.16602 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner: M/s.P.Kritika Kamal For Respondents: Mr.Mohamed Riyaz, Government Advocate (Criminal side) For R1 Mr.M.Govindaraju for S.M.A.Mohammed Faiz Mohideen for R2 *** O R D E R The parties seek to quash the final report and the proceedings in C.C.No.743 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate- II, Poonamallee. 2. On perusal of records, it can be seen that the case is for the offences under Sections 498A, 323 and 506(1) of the Indian Penal Code arising out of the matrimonial discard. It is now represented that the parties have resolved their differences between themselves and are parting as friends and taken a decision to file a divorce petition by way of mutual consent. 3. In view thereof, following the dictum of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in B.S.Joshi vs. State of Haryana and others1, is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 1Reported in (2003) 4 SCC 675 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No.16602 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition in Crl.O.P.No.16602 of 2026 stands allowed. The final report and the proceedings in C.C.No.743 of 2023 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Poonamallee stands quashed. 01-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No sts To: 1) The Judicial Magistrate II, Poonamallee, Chennai 2) The Inspector of Police, W-33, All Women Police Station, Virugambakkam, Chennai. [Crime No.02 of 2023] 3) The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No.16602 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. sts Order made in CRL.O.P.No.16602 of 2026 Dated: 01-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis