Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4328 (BOM)

SHITAL RAJENDRA SODHA v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/2268/2026 · 2026-08-27

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2-ABA-2268-2026 W IA-2944-2026.ODT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2268 OF 2026 Mrs. Shital Rajendra Sodha …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra And Anr. …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2944 OF 2026 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2268 OF 2026 Bhavin Dhirajlal Muni …Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Mrs. Shital Rajendra Sodha …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra And Anr. …Respondents Adv. Anup A. Lahoti, for the Applicant. Mr. Ashok S. Gawai, A.P. P., for the Respondent – State. Adv. Hemant P. Ingle a/w Adv. Mrunal Ingle i/b Adv. Prashant S. Goyal, for the Respondent No.2. PI Sangle, Dahisar Police Station, Mumbai, is present. CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE : 27TH AUGUST 2026 P.C:- 1. After arguing the matter for some time when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for applicant seeks leave to withdraw the instant application. Learned counsel for applicant states that the applicant desires to surrender before the investigating agency. 27th August 2026 2-ABA-2268-2026 W IA-2944-2026.ODT 2. Permission is granted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. 3. In view of this, application is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending interim application also stands disposed of. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) VDMokal/- 27th August 2026