Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43279 (KAR)

MADAN N v. STATE BY

CRL.P/10151/2024 · 2026-09-25

Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010472832024 NC: 2026:KHC:53445 CRL.P No. 10151 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10151 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MADAN N S/O NANJAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO. 1688, 10TH CROSS, ASHOKAPURAM, MYSURU 2. CHIDANANDA C S/O CHIKKASWAMY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NO. 1894, 6TH CROSS, ASHOKAPURAM, MYSURU 3. KEERTHIRAJ S/O HEMANNA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO.1688, CH 22/2, 10TH CROSS, ASHOKAPURAM, MYSURU 4. SURESH B S/O BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT NO. 2018, 9TH CROSS, ASHOKAPURAM, MYSURU 5. ADARSHA.C S/O. CHIKKASWAMY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT 1594, 6TH CROSS, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010472832024 NC: 2026:KHC:53445 CRL.P No. 10151 of 2024 ASHOKAPURAM MYSURU 6. SHARATH.J.R. S/O JAVARAPPA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/AT NO. 2141, CH 14, 1ST CROSS, ASHOKAPURAM, MYSURU …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. DINAKAR M.P, ADVOCATE AND SRI. SOMARJUNA V.M, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: STATE BY VIDYARANYAPURAM POLICE STATION MYSURU REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AT CR.NO.31/2024 FILED BY THE VIDYARANYAPURAM POLICE MYSURU, UNDER SECTION 353, 332, 510, 341, 504, 506, 143, 144, 149 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call. 2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010472832024 NC: 2026:KHC:53445 CRL.P No. 10151 of 2024 same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court. 3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5