HANUMANTHA @ HANUMANTHAPPA BANAKER v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/2151/2024 · 2026-09-28
Rajesh Rai K
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43267 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43267 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010130852024 NC: 2026:KHC:53627 CRL.P No. 2151 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2151 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
1.
HANUMANTHA @ HANUMANTHAPPA BANAKER SON OF BASANAGOWDA B. BANAKER, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.4, ANJANEYA TEMPLE, KENCHANAHALLI, RAJARJESHWARINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 098
PERMANENT RESIDENT OF RESIDING AT NO.72, JOGIHALI, TAVARAGI, HIREKORUR HAVERI - 581 111 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR K N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010130852024 NC: 2026:KHC:53627 CRL.P No. 2151 of 2024
HIGH COURT COMPLEX BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
SMT. JAYALAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, PRESENTLY AT NO.75, NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR KENCHANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 098.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAVEED S., HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.8156/2013 (CR.NO.18/2013) FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. C.M.M., XLVI ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
ORAL ORDER
Despite granting sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to comply the office objections, the same has not been done by the petitioners.
2. The matter was listed today for dismissal, despite there is no representation for the petitioner.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010130852024 NC: 2026:KHC:53627 CRL.P No. 2151 of 2024
3. This petition is of the year 2024 and there is no reason to grant further time to comply the office objections and it could be presumed that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
4. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
CR/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9