Vishal Kumar Chaudhary @ Vishal Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./90459/2025 · 2026-01-12
R P Mishra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43264 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43264 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90459 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-457 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Vishal Kumar Chaudhary @ Vishal Kumar S/o Dev Raj Chaudhary @ Kallu Chaudhary Resident of - Ratanpur (Nilami Kothi), P.S - Bhagwan Bajar, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mirtunjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 457 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 35 liters of country made liquor was recovered from motorcycle. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is not the owner of the motorcycle. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed by the local people. The petitioner is in custody
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90459 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 since 16.10.2025 and has got six criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 457 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial.
In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. manish/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T