Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43263 (PAT)

Shamim Akhtar @ Md. Samim v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./89736/2025 · 2026-01-09

Harish Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89736 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42306 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2024 Thana- SIKTI District- Araria ====================================================== 1. Shamim Akhtar @ Md. Samim S/O Salimuddin @ Datu R/O Village- Thiraniganj Bhorha, P.S- Terhagachh, Distt.- Kishanganj. 2. Aaliya Begum W/O Shamim Akhtar @ Md. Samim R/O Village- Thiraniganj Bhorha, P.S- Terhagachh, Distt.- Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 09-01-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The application is filed for modification of the order dated 17.10.2025 passed by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 42306 of 2025 for expunging the condition imposed upon the petitioners that one of the bailor shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners and further for extending the period of surrender to the petitioners before the learned Court. 3. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that while extending the privilege of anticipatory bail, the afore- noted condition has been imposed, however, it is the fact that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89736 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026 2/2 petitioners are resident of village Thiraniganj Bhorha, P.S. Terhagachh, District Kishanganj whereas the instant case is of District Araria where none of the own-close family members of the petitioners are residing and, as such, they are not able to produce the bailors. 4. Learned Advocate for the State is also present. 5. In view of the submissions advanced and the averments made in the modification application, the same stands allowed. 6. The condition imposed upon the petitioners that one of the bailor shall be one of the close family member of the petitioners, stands expunged. 7. The orders stands modified to the extent indicated hereinabove. 8. The petitioners are directed to ensure their surrender and furnish bail bond preferably within a period of four weeks from today. supratim/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T