Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43253 (KAR)

SMT. BHARATHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/2731/2024 · 2026-09-28

Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010162292024 NC: 2026:KHC:53631 CRL.P No. 2731 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2731 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BHARATHI W/O LATE SHRI CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 2ND FLOOR, NO.5, 1ST MAIN ROAD 1ST CROSS, T G LAYOUT, ITTAMADU BANASHANKARI, 3RD STAGE BANGALORE-560 085 2. DR SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O SHRI K MANI R/A NO.61, 9TH CROSS 5TH MAIN, RC AGRAHARA CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE-560 018 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VISHWANATH N, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010162292024 NC: 2026:KHC:53631 CRL.P No. 2731 of 2024 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY C.K ACHHUKATTU POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. PRASAD T.N S/O LATE M K NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.248, 2ND G MAIN, 11TH BLOCK NEAR VINAYAKA PARK NAGARABAHVI 2ND PHASE BANGALORE-560072 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.14924/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED II ACMM BENGALURU CITY IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER HEREIN WHO ARE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 IN THE SAID PROCEEDINGS REGISTERED ON THE FILE OF RESPONDENT C.K.ACHHUKATTU POLICE FOR THE COMMISSION OF OFFENCE ALLEGED U/S.341,448,504,506,149 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010162292024 NC: 2026:KHC:53631 CRL.P No. 2731 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER Despite granting sufficient opportunity to the petitioners to comply the office objections, the same has not been done by the petitioners. 2. The matter was listed today for dismissal, despite there is no representation for the petitioners. 3. This petition is of the year 2024 and there is no reason to grant further time to comply the office objections and it could be presumed that the petitioners are not interested to pursue this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court. 4. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE CR/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10