Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4322 (CAL)

DHIRAJ KAR AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/554/2026 · 2026-02-27

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27/02/2026 D/L – 65 Court No.28 S. Kundu Allowed C.R.M.(A) 554 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Rampurhat P.S case no. 62 of 2026 dated 26/1/2026 under sections 329(2)/115(2)/109(1)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS. In the matter of: Dhiraj Kar & Ors. ...Petitioners. Mr. M.H. Chowdhury …for the petitioners. Mr. Binoy Kr. Panda Ms. Rituparna Saha …for the State. 1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties. 2. Perused the case diary. 3. Considering the above and the other materials available in the case diary including the injury report which does not show infliction of any grievous injury, I do not think that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is required in this case and I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to further conditions that the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation and shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses. The petitioner nos. 1 and 2 2 shall meet the Investigating Officer once a week till submission of report in final form. 5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed. 6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)