ANSHUL MISHRA S/O LATE GHANSHYAM PRASAD MISHRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1443/2026 · 2026-03-05
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4321 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4321 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9484] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1443/2026 Anshul Mishra S/o Late Ghanshyam Prasad Mishra, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Mig, 24, Civil Ward No. 06 Near Lic, Vivekanand Nagar Damoh Khas, P/s Kotwali Damoh, District Damoh (M.p.) (Accused Presently Confined In District Jail Jhalawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhim Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Vinod Sharma Mr. Sapan Soni HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 05/03/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 20/2026 registered at Police Station Bhalta District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 8/21, 29 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, aged about 34 years. It is submitted that there is no criminal antecedent registered against the applicant. It is next submitted that recovered quantity of the contraband is much less than that of the commercial quantity. It is also submitted that applicant is in custody ever since 14.01.2026. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no
[2026:RJ-JP:9484] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1443/2026] useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind bars till disposal of the case.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application.
4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that accused- applicant is a young man aged about 34 years; that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family; that there is no criminal antecedent registered against the applicant; that the accused- applicant is in custody ever since 14.01.2026; that the recovered quantity of the contraband is much less than the commercial quantity and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him/her on bail.
5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Anshul Mishra S/o Late Ghanshyam Prasad Mishra shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/43